How to Obtain Vibrating-Wire Measurements in Environments with High Electromagnetic Noise

by Timothy Jeppsen | Updated: 10/07/2020 | Comments: 0

Search the Blog


Blog Languages

English
Français (French)


Subscribe to the Blog

Get an email when a new article is posted. Choose the topics that interest you most.


Area / Application

Product Category

Activity

Corporate / News

Enter your email address:



Suggest an Article

Is there a topic you would like to learn more about? Let us know.

Leave this field empty

Dam, water, sunset

In 1997, I had my first introduction to using vibrating-wire piezometers to measure groundwater fluctuations. A large engineering firm was monitoring water level to ensure that construction of a large pipeline through the San Bernardino Mountains was not intruding on the groundwater. I was hired to install CR10X dataloggers with AVW100 vibrating-wire interfaces to measure the piezometers. Data from the CR10X was transmitted to the engineering firm via cellular modem.

The data from each of the eight sites was regularly transmitted and looked good, until the construction of the tunnel through the mountain began. As soon as the electromagnetic noise of the heavy tunneling equipment reached the vibrating-wire sensors, the readings were lost in all the noise. Water-level changes could not be detected due to the extreme out-of-range readings caused by the noise.

Vibrating-wire sensors were originally selected for this project because they are known to be very accurate and stable over long periods of deployment. However, as we discovered, they are also very susceptible to external electromagnetic noise.

Time-Domain Analysis

At the time the monitoring equipment was installed, time-domain analysis was the method used to read a vibrating-wire sensor. The AVW100 would excite the sensor wire and then measure the average time between a predetermined number of positive-slope zero crossings to give the wire’s resonant period. The resonant frequency is the reciprocal of the resonant period. Using time-domain analysis is the traditional method all manufacturers measure a vibrating-wire sensor.

This method of measuring vibrating-wire sensors works very well in low-noise environments. However, in noisy environments, the sensor measurement is lost in the noise.

Spectral Analysis

In 2008, Campbell Scientific introduced the AVW200 and AVW206 vibrating-wire analyzer modules. These modules implemented the patented* spectral-analysis technique to measure vibrating-wire sensors, which eliminates the electromagnetic noise.

The spectral-analysis approach analyzes the response of the excited wire as a function of frequency, rather than time. Not only does this approach remove the noise, but it also improves the measurement precision. Manufacturers of vibrating-wire sensors typically will resolve changes in resonant frequency to 0.1 Hz. In the absence of noise, a measurement precision of 0.01 Hz rms is achieved using the time-domain method, whereas a measurement precision of 0.001 Hz rms is achieved using spectral analysis.

Graph showing spectral analysis versus time-domain analysis

Vibrating-Wire Spectral-Analysis Technology (VSPECT®)

The patented VSPECT® technology is available in several Campbell Scientific products. Click any of these links to learn more about these products:

To learn more about our patented VSPECT® technology, visit our VSPECT® Essentials web resource.

*The dynamic vibrating-wire measurement technique is protected under U.S. Patent No. 8,671,758, and the vibrating-wire spectral-analysis technology (VSPECT® is protected under U.S. Patent No. 7,779,690.


Share This Article



About the Author

timothy jeppsen Timothy is the Senior Marketing Manager at Campbell Scientific, Inc. He began his Campbell career as an Applications Engineer specializing in aquaculture applications and has also held positions as a sales engineer, manager of the Water Resources Group, and Marketing Product Manager for data loggers and communications products. Timothy received his bachelor’s degree in marketing from Utah State University and his master’s degree in quantitative genetics from Auburn University.

View all articles by this author.


Comments

Please log in or register to comment.